BA 260 WEEK 3 BUSINESS TORTS
Business torts involving wrongful interference are generally divided into two categories: wrongful interference with a contractual relationship and wrongful interference with a business relationship. From what I can gather from the information provided, Quik could start a case based on wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. If they take this course of action, they would have to prove three elements which are (1) a valid, enforceable contract between the two parties; (2) a third party must have knowledge that this contract exists; (3) the third party must intentionally cause either of the two parties to break the contract. In this situation, there was a valid enforceable contract between Quik and Precise. It seems as if Retail had knowledge of this contract between Quik and Precise because Retail, “induced” or persuaded Sam, which is a subcontractor
Business torts involving wrongful interference are generally divided into two categories: wrongful interference with a contractual relationship and wrongful interference with a business relationship. From what I can gather from the information provided, Quik could start a case based on wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. If they take this course of action, they would have to prove three elements which are (1) a valid, enforceable contract between the two parties; (2) a third party must have knowledge that this contract exists; (3) the third party must intentionally cause either of the two parties to break the contract. In this situation, there was a valid enforceable contract between Quik and Precise. It seems as if Retail had knowledge of this contract between Quik and Precise because Retail, “induced” or persuaded Sam, which is a subcontractor
Business torts involving wrongful interference are generally divided into two categories: wrongful interference with a contractual relationship and wrongful interference with a business relationship. From what I can gather from the information provided, Quik could start a case based on wrongful interference with a contractual relationship. If they take this course of action, they would have to prove three elements which are (1) a valid, enforceable contract between the two parties; (2) a third party must have knowledge that this contract exists; (3) the third party must intentionally cause either of the two parties to break the contract. In this situation, there was a valid enforceable contract between Quik and Precise. It seems as if Retail had knowledge of this contract between Quik and Precise because Retail, “induced” or persuaded Sam, which is a subcontractor
No comments:
Post a Comment